Grasping Hand
图书信息
| 作者 | Somin, Ilya |
| 出版社 | University of Chicago Press |
| ISBN | 9780226256740 |
| 出版时间 | 2015-05-28 |
| 字数 | 75.6万 |
| 分类 | University of Chicago Press,进口书,外文原版书,文学,自传,回忆录 |
读书简介
In 2005, the Supreme Court ruled that the city of New London, Connecticut, could condemn fifteen residential properties in order to transfer them to a new private owner. Although the Fifth Amendment only permits the taking of private property for "e;public use,"e; the Court ruled that the transfer of condemned land to private parties for "e;economic development"e; is permitted by the Constitution-even if the government cannot prove that the expected development will ever actually happen. The Court's decision in Kelo v. City of New London empowered the grasping hand of the state at the expense of the invisible hand of the market.In this detailed study of one of the most controversial Supreme Court cases in modern times, Ilya Somin argues that Kelo was a grave error. Economic development and "e;blight"e; condemnations are unconstitutional under both originalist and most "e;living constitution"e; theories of legal interpretation. They also victimize the poor and the politically weak for the benefit of powerful interest groups and often destroy more economic value than they create. Kelo itself exemplifies these patterns. The residents targeted for condemnation lacked the influence needed to combat the formidable government and corporate interests arrayed against them.Moreover, the city's poorly conceived development plan ultimately failed: the condemned land lies empty to this day, occupied only by feral cats. The Supreme Court's unpopular ruling triggered an unprecedented political reaction, with forty-five states passing new laws intended to limit the use of eminent domain. But many of the new laws impose few or no genuine constraints on takings. The Kelo backlash led to significant progress, but not nearly as much as it may have seemed.Despite its outcome, the closely divided 5-4 ruling shattered what many believed to be a consensus that virtually any condemnation qualifies as a public use under the Fifth Amendment. It also showed that there is widespread public opposition to eminent domain abuse. With controversy over takings sure to continue, The Grasping Hand offers the first book-length analysis of Kelo by a legal scholar, alongside a broader history of the dispute over public use and eminent domain and an evaluation of options for reform.?
目录
Cover
Title Page
Copyright Page
Dedication
Contents
Acknowledgments
Introduction
CHAPTER 1. The Trouble in Fort Trumbull
CHAPTER 2. From Public Use to Public Purpose
CHAPTER 3. The Perils of Public Purpose
CHAPTER 4. The Kelo Decision
CHAPTER 5. The Political Backlash
CHAPTER 6. Why the Backlash Often Fell Short
CHAPTER 7. The Judicial Reaction
CHAPTER 8. Should Blight and Economic Development Takings Be Reformed or Banned?
Conclusion
Appendix A
Appendix B
Notes
Index
- 重返马赛渔场:社会规范与私人治理的局限([法]葛弗瑞著蔡雪晴编张鹿苹译)
- 异重庆四重奏(萧星寒)
- 老照片-南京旧影-高清典藏本(叶兆言)
- 财务管理(袁建国,周丽媛)
- 学前儿童感觉统合训练(南姣鹏主编)
- 中国高铁、贸易成本和企业出口研究(俞峰)
- 观文化.看政治-印度后殖民时代的电视.女性和国家([美]普尔尼马・曼克卡尔著,晋群译)
- 我的洋插队-魅力波罗的海(何杰)
